go away spammer

Author Topic: $50 bot, 4 AA radioshack battery pack  (Read 2689 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mantale1Topic starter

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 12
  • Helpful? 0
$50 bot, 4 AA radioshack battery pack
« on: January 17, 2011, 06:23:27 PM »
I'm using the radioshack battery pack for the $50 bot. It's unclear from the tutorial and the $50 bot pdf whether I should solder the batter pack to the 3 male pins directly wired to the 5V regulator or if I should bypass that as the pdf doc says. What should I do?

Offline Soeren

  • Supreme Robot
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,672
  • Helpful? 227
  • Mind Reading: 0.0
Re: $50 bot, 4 AA radioshack battery pack
« Reply #1 on: January 17, 2011, 10:17:36 PM »
Hi,

I'm using the radioshack battery pack for the $50 bot. It's unclear from the tutorial and the $50 bot pdf whether I should solder the batter pack to the 3 male pins directly wired to the 5V regulator or if I should bypass that as the pdf doc says. What should I do?
Where in the .pdf do you see any mention of bypassing the regulator?

The power for the servos and the power for the rest are two different supplies. You may have luck running the servo supply to the voltage regulator input and thus avoid the 9V battery, but don't bypass it (or you'll kill your µcontroller).
What isn't clear from the .pdf is, that you need to connect the grounds of both supplies.
Regards,
Søren

A rather fast and fairly heavy robot with quite large wheels needs what? A lot of power?
Please remember...
Engineering is based on numbers - not adjectives

Offline mantale1Topic starter

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 12
  • Helpful? 0
Re: $50 bot, 4 AA radioshack battery pack
« Reply #2 on: January 18, 2011, 01:29:28 PM »
Well the reason I was confused was because in the tutorial the situation was described as one could either use a 4AA battery pack or a 9V battery. I was concerned because I did not want to bypass the voltage regulator, but the pdf doc suggests the the 4AA battery pack at 6V does not need to be wired to the regulator.

Offline Soeren

  • Supreme Robot
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,672
  • Helpful? 227
  • Mind Reading: 0.0
Re: $50 bot, 4 AA radioshack battery pack
« Reply #3 on: January 18, 2011, 05:16:04 PM »
Hi,

[...] but the pdf doc suggests the the 4AA battery pack at 6V does not need to be wired to the regulator.
Exactly - the positive wire from the 4xAA only goes to the servos, for which a 9V (PP3) wouldn't be able to supply the current needed.
Regards,
Søren

A rather fast and fairly heavy robot with quite large wheels needs what? A lot of power?
Please remember...
Engineering is based on numbers - not adjectives

Offline VegaObscura

  • Robot Overlord
  • ****
  • Posts: 153
  • Helpful? 6
Re: $50 bot, 4 AA radioshack battery pack
« Reply #4 on: January 18, 2011, 09:04:37 PM »
The tutorial at no point says you can use a 4AA Battery pack OR a 9V battery.  You can use either a 6V battery pack or both a 4AA battery pack and a 9v Battery.  Remember, you always need at least 6V to power the board, and a 4AA battery pack (assuming NIMH rechargable batteries) will only give you 4.8V.

Again, 6V OR 9V+4AA

Offline mantale1Topic starter

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 12
  • Helpful? 0
Re: $50 bot, 4 AA radioshack battery pack
« Reply #5 on: January 18, 2011, 10:54:16 PM »
Sorry about the confusion, I'm using the AA batteries X 4, not the NiMh rechargeable pack. So I have 6V. Thanks

Offline Soeren

  • Supreme Robot
  • *****
  • Posts: 4,672
  • Helpful? 227
  • Mind Reading: 0.0
Re: $50 bot, 4 AA radioshack battery pack
« Reply #6 on: January 20, 2011, 11:34:25 AM »
Hi,

I'm using the AA batteries X 4, not the NiMh rechargeable pack. So I have 6V.
Just a FYI...
4 primary cells (eg. alkaline) will start out at 6V, but before considered flat, the voltage have gone down to 3.6V - you won't be able to use more than say 25% of their capacity or less, as the voltage regulator needs at least 5.5V in to work.
Regards,
Søren

A rather fast and fairly heavy robot with quite large wheels needs what? A lot of power?
Please remember...
Engineering is based on numbers - not adjectives

 


Get Your Ad Here

data_list