Don't ad-block us - support your favorite websites. We have safe, unobstrusive, robotics related ads that you actually want to see - see here for more.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
what would be better suited for the determination of timing cycles on a microcontroller?
Also the one you posted only samples at 200 Khz, whereas the atmega 8 and 168 have a default of 8 Mhz, now me and acronyms dont get along, but I think that the Mhz is faster then the Khz.
why would I chose a PC over a desktop oscilloscope?
Started by zamboniman60
Started by dellagd
Started by convoluted
Started by omkar