Society of Robots - Robot Forum
Electronics => Electronics => Topic started by: airman00 on November 11, 2007, 12:59:40 PM
-
Lets say I have two servos - one needs 169 and another needs 175 to go forward at the same speed.
Those servos are using 5V. If i were to give them 6V instead of the 5V, would the PW numbers change? If so would the amount of change be equal for each servo?
-
I believe it would change - motors operate on curves depending on the torque and current and voltage they are given.
I suggest optical encoders so you don't need to guess and check all the time.
-
said another way... Let's say you have a robot that uses two servo motors and is all set up and works "perfectly" using 5v. Now you add an extra battery changing the voltage to 6 volts. The robot will behave just as it did before, but it will move faster.
-
said another way...
steve, you are contradicting the previous post, that's not "said another way" ;)
I agree with Half Shell
-
If so would the amount of change be equal for each servo?
What about that question?
-
in short no.
it is likely due to be a curvature type change as far as the motors are concerned and not a linear change, theoretically a servo should operate linearly but remember that they still operate with motors ie. coils of wire.
because its such a small change in voltage, you may get away with it not causing too much drift to one side, its likely you may have had a slight drift to start with that you didnt notice. its the type of thing where a greater change will produce an even greater effect, the only way to really know if it will work for you is to test it yourself.
-
If you look at the spec sheet it says that servo speed increases with voltage, which makes sense . . . but the direction won't change.
For a robot operating in a very uncontrolled environment, that increase in speed won't affect your robot's ability to work so I wouldn't sweat it. For example with my Stampy sumo bot, I just guessed at speed values and said 'thats good enough, its rotating in the right direction . . .'