![]() |
||
![]()
MISC
SKILLS
HARDWARE
SCIENCE |
This robot was built as a locomotion type experiment, attempting to cross the efficiency of wheels with the advantages of legs. I worked on it on and off for many years, with a half dozen different versions. I'm currently thinking of a much better v6, and one day I'll actually make it . . . A quick evolution documentary of all the Carpet Monkey robots is shown in the first video.
Version 1
Springs were used to allow the arms to flex inward. This gave the arm reach to climb, but shortened when needed to reduce the moment arm and smoothen movement.
Version 2
cutting the design out . . .
tracing it onto aluminum using a marker . . .
then cutting it out with a bandsaw and a drill press for holes.
But the single claw design was inefficient. If I added a dual claw, shown below, it would double the speed and smoothen out the robot motion.
I still wasn't happy with the gripping power of the claw, so I tried out some Plasti Dip on the claws. It was fairly weak and wore away fast. I tried adding some fine sand (that I 'borrowed' from a Mars rover test bed, hehe) to the Plasti Dip mixture to improve dip rigidity, but it still wasn't good enough . . .
I wanted Carpet Monkey to climb stairs, but its body would slip a lot on each step. As an attempted solution, I created a one-way friction grip thingy out of a sheet of rubbery plastic I bandsawed into this below:
and attached this 'tail' to the bottom of the robot using Velcro:
It just barely managed to climb 4" stairs. Without the tail it didn't stand a chance.
Version 3
Here is the chassis next to version 2 for size comparison.
Some spacers added . . .
One of the dual claws, with the largest servo I could find at the time (but wasn't strong enough).
Fully assembled with springs added.
Carpet Monkey effectively drags it's butt, so I added a big caster wheel there to improve efficiency.
Version 4
In v3, the claws were a bit flimsy, so I double layered them. I also used a compression pneumatic spring this time, but it was too stiff . . . should have used a much lower spring constant . . .
A rear view, with metal box motor drivers, and my caster wheel again.
These claws took forever to CNC, had to make *too many* by hand . . .
After this failure, I decided to never ever build a robot again without first fully calculating the whole darn thing. Math would have saved me tons of money/time! |
|
Has this site helped you with your robot? Give us credit -
link back, and help others in the forums! Society of Robots copyright 2005-2014 |